Recognised by physicians from at least the tenth century, an ectopic pregnancy is when a fertilized ovum develops and implants outside the womb, either in a Fallopian tube or, more rarely, in the abdominal cavity. The developing ovum outgrows its blood supply and dies, causing severe bleeding. This condition is rare. Less than 2% of pregnant women have an ectopic pregnancy.
If you are experiencing severe pain in your abdomen (usually on one side), heavy vaginal bleeding and you feel faint (particularly if you have already had a positive pregnancy test), go to a hospital at once. If it is discovered to be an ectopic pregnancy, the situation may be life threatening and will need prompt surgery. In serious cases, the affected fallopian tube may need to be removed. Sometimes an early ectopic pregnancy can "miscarry" itself, without your knowledge.
Common symptoms are lower abdominal pain, often on one side at the beginning, light bleeding, nausea and vomiting, dizziness or weakness, and/or pain in the shoulder or rectum. If the fallopian tube ruptures, the pain and/or internal bleeding can be severe, enough to cause fainting.
You are more likely to have an ectopic pregnancy if you have previously had an infection in your fallopian tube or a Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID) or your fallopian tubes have been otherwise damaged. The embryo may have difficulty passing through a damaged tube causing it to implant and grow in the tube. Things that make a woman more likely to have fallopian tube damage and subsequent ectopic pregnancy include, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID), endometriosis, previous pelvic surgery, induced abortion and smoking. The chances also increase if you become pregnant while wearing a coil (IUD) or while taking the Mini-pill.
The rate of ectopic pregnancy increased more than fourfold between 1970 and 1990, in particular chlamydia and gonorrhea, as well as pelvic inflammatory disease which is often, but not always, sexually transmitted.
Other causes of ectopic pregnancy include a previous ectopic pregnancy, the use of an intrauterine device (IUD), congenital abnormality of the fallopian tubes, the Pill (minipills, progestogen-only oral contraceptives), prior pelvic or abdominal surgery, and a failed tubal sterilisation. The consequences of an ectopic pregnancy depend on many factors and range from no damage to your reproductive organs to the complete removal of a ruptured fallopian tube.
You can still have a healthy pregnancy after having had an ectopic pregnancy, although your chances of conception are slightly reduced.
Ectopic pregnancy is not an issue in the abortion debate. The removal of an ectopic pregnancy is not an abortion and has never been considered as such either under the terms of the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act or the 1983 Eight Amendment to the Irish Constitution. Since the first description of the surgical management of ectopic pregnancy by Lawson Tait in 1884 there has never been even a suggestion that a doctor who removes an ectopic pregnancy should be prosecuted.
There has not been a single death from an ectopic pregnancy in Ireland over the last 20 years, where abortion is illegal.
In Britain, however, where abortion is legal, 4 - 6 women die from ectopic pregnancies each year.
An ectopic pregnancy is an abnormal pregnancy whereby the embryo implants anywhere in the woman’s body outside the uterine cavity which is the normal place for a baby to develop. The vast majority of ectopic pregnancies implant in the fallopian tube, the other ectopics are ovarian, cervical and intra-abdominal.
Whilst there have been cases of non-tubal pregnancies surviving to viability and resulting in healthy babies being born, tubal pregnancies carry a high risk of rupture and haemorrhage which can be a serious surgical emergency for a woman. Nowadays, death from a ruptured ectopic pregnancy is rare as they are diagnosed early and women have access to surgical and medical treatment.
There are a few options for treating an ectopic pregnancy and these can be divided into medical and surgical therapies. Unfortunately there does not yet exist a procedure whereby a surgeon can remove the embryo and reimplant it into the mother’s uterus to allow it to grow normally. It’s important to remember that a tubal pregnancy left untreated carries with it a high risk of mortality from bleeding which will result in death of both mother and baby.
With surgical therapy there are two approaches; a salpingectomy and a salpingotomy. With a salpingectomy the diseased tube is cut out, this can be a total salpingectomy whereby the entire tube is removed or a partial salpingectomy whereby the unhealthy portion only is removed and the remainder of the tube is rejoined to try and preserve a woman’s fertility. A salpingectomy is a rapid and definite resolution of the ecoptic pregnancy.
With a salpingotomy the embryo is removed through an incision made in the fallopian tube, and the defect in the tube closed with sutures.
The medical approach to treating an ectopic pregnancy involves the adminstration of a drug called Methotrexate which breaks down placental tissue and treats the ectopic pregnancy.
Abortion is not needed to treat an ectopic pregnancy and the current treatments that are available for such pregnancies are not considered abortion as far as the medical community is concerned. There are a few things to consider in this regard:
It is important to remember that an ectopic pregnancy is not a normal healthy pregnancy, it is a diseased condition that carries serious risk for the mother and it is that pathological process that needs to be treated.
The treatment for this condition does not meet the definition of abortion which is the purposeful destruction of the unborn in the termination of pregnancy.
The intent of the doctor needs to be considered in every intervention; in the treatment of an ectopic pregnancy his or her intent is to treat an abnormal condition and avert serious risk to the mother. In an abortion the intent is to end the life of a living baby. Intent is something that carries serious weight, in medicine and in criminal law.
In Ireland, a country where there is ban on abortion yet permits all necessary care to a pregnant woman, treatments for ectopic pregnancies are carried out without prosecution or judgement because these are not considered to be abortion.
Not a single woman has needed to travel to Britain for an abortion to treat her ectopic pregnancy – proof that these interventions are not abortions and can be carried out in Ireland under our current laws and Medical Council Guidelines.
Many obstetricians have testified to the fact that treatment of ectopic pregnancies does not involve abortion:
Former Chairperson of the Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Professor John Bonnar has testifed that the treatment for ectopic pregnancy “is not abortion as far as the medical professional is concerend” but rather “essential treatment to preserve the life of the mother”
He went on to say that; “A ban on abortion does not involve treatment of ectopic pregnancies; you would have to be a misguided doctor to think that it did”.
In his oral submission to the Oireachtas Dr James Clinch explained what acutally happens in Irish medical practice: “You are working in a hospital, you find somebody with a tube that’s swollen, bursting, about to rupture and maybe do something terrible. You’re a registrar or senior registrar. You treat that woman the best way you can. Your intention in treating that woman and her tube is not to kill a baby. That’s why the word intention was put in. So that’s how I would look at that”
A recent study of maternal mortality in Ireland by the Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists confirmed the low rate of maternal mortality in Ireland and noted that no deaths from ectopic pregnancy were recorded in this country.
An article discussing the significance of intent as applied to medical therapies and abortion in situations such as ectopic pregnancies was featured in the Journal Health Care Ethics. This stated that “although the action that corrects the pathology, whether surgical or medical, is the same action that brings about the death of the embryo, that death is not the direct effect that is intended”.
The treatment of ectopics gets better and better all the time with advances in medicine making it possible now to transfer the pregnancy from the tube into the uterus. In reality, there have been many reports of successful ectopic pregnancies. Two obstetricians in New York, Dr.’s Hellman and Simon, published details on 316 ectopic pregnancies which resulted in live births between 1809 and 1935.  (Only half of these children survived their first week of life, but these births occurred long before the development of the first neonatal intensive care unit. With modern technology, it is likely that many more would have survived.)
But consider this case that was documented in 1917, nearly 100 years ago. In the Harvard Medical Library in Volume XXIV of the medical journal Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics. In the article Transplantations of Ectopic Pregnancy from Fallopian Tube to Cavity of the Uterus, Dr. C. J. Wallace describes a successful transplant of such an out-of-place baby into his mom's womb:
In Duluth, Minnesota during an operation on a 27-year-old woman Dr. Wallace:
"found an ectopic gestation in the left tube," which was "enlarged to the size of a walnut... Knowing their anxiety for raising a child, I decided to try, at least, the only thing at hand -- to transplant the ectopic pregnancy. ... I carefully opened the tube and dissected the pregnancy out intact, being careful not to injure the sac in any way by keeping wide away and including part of the tube-wall. It came out very easily and was in size about equal to a large olive. It was at once placed within the cavity of the opened uterus... The tube was closed in like manner and left in place. The patient was watched carefully... for two weeks with no symptoms whatever. ... The pregnancy went on normally to full term and resulted in the natural birth of a fine boy, fully developed and without a scar, May 2, 1916."
Kings College Hospital in London delivered a baby boy in 1999, who had grown inside his mother's fallopian tube together with two sisters who developed normally in the womb. Jane Ingram, 32, had not been taking fertility drugs but discovered she was carrying triplets 18 weeks into the pregnancy. Ten weeks later, a routine scan revealed that one of the embryos had developed outside the womb in the fallopian tubes - a situation known as an ectopic pregnancy, which is potentially life-threatening.
In an ectopic pregnancy the woman's fallopian tube ruptures, usually leading to loss of the pregnancy and massive internal bleeding which can prove fatal for the mother. But in Ronan's case, when the tube ruptured the embryo attached itself to the mother's uterus and created its own "womb", with its own blood supply, in the mother's abdominal cavity.
Scans at the time showed only a normal twin pregnancy and it was not until much later doctors discovered the truth. Consultant obstetrician Dr Davor Jurkovic, who delivered Ronan, along with his two sisters, said it was a "miracle" that the triplets and the mother had survived.
And Mrs Ingram's bravery had been central to the success of the birth. "Jane was absolutely incredible. The attitude of the patient in situations like this is crucial and her attitude was always positive," he said.
Ronan developed outside the womb
A mother in Missouri and her baby daughter are both healthy after a rare and undiscovered ectopic pregnancy. Jonna Snodgrass, 36, delivered Katelyn Snodgrass at Heartland Regional Medical Center’s New Beginnings Unit in August 2013
Doctors discovered the baby girl was ectopic and didn’t implant in the uterus, instead implanting in one of her mother's ovaries. See this report from KQTV on Heartland Hospital's Maternity Unit.
Jayne Jones, then 27 weeks pregnant, learned that her baby was growing not in her womb but in her abdomen, on the omentum – the layers of fat that cover the bowel. It is the rarest form of ectopic pregnancy, found in one in 50,000 of all pregnancies, and one of the riskiest.
In 2008, an Australian baby has been dubbed a miracle after she survived -- in what is believed to be a world first -- a full-term ovarian pregnancy. Durga Thangarajah defied the odds and was born at Darwin Private Hospital after a two-hour delicate operation saw doctors carefully cut her from her mother Meera's right ovary.
READ MORE HERE: http://www.ntnews.com.au/article/2008/05/30/4247_ntnews.html
A 22-year-old has given birth to a healthy baby girl who grew outside her womb. The woman, in Tanzania, only discovered when she was 32 weeks pregnant that her baby was developing in her abdomen. It is thought that the fertilised egg initially implanted in her fallopian tube from where it was expelled, allowing it to implant again in her abdomen.
The U.S. Department of Health’s online library, PubMed Central, contains several professional articles with titles such as “Full Term Intra-abdominal Pregnancy with Living Mother and Child,” .
Sage Dalton was born in July of 1999 after developing in the amniotic membrane outside her mother’s womb. The reports go on and on and on. Doctors are often amazed by the unborn child’s ability to develop and grow regardless of his location within his mother’s body.
Most of the doctors who have written about successful ectopic pregnancies have focused primarily on the details of one or two cases, There are a few, however, who have taken the initiative to study multiple cases, and their conclusions have been markedly different. A 1996 study from Chile, for example, found that out of 11 abdominal pregnancies, there were 7 live births with 5 of those children surviving the neonatal period. Another study conducted in 2008 reviewed 158 abdominal pregnancies worldwide and found that 28% of the children survived the perinatal period but did not report on the actual number of live births. These reports are consistent with a 2010 article which stated that the reported perinatal survival rate for abdominal pregnancies ranges from 5-60%.
 Hellman, A. and J. H. Simon, "Full Term Intra-abdominal Pregnancy," American Journal of Surgery, 29:403, 1935.
 Teh, Hu Sin “Full Term Intra-abdominal Pregnancy with Living Mother and Child,” PubMed Central, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2602194 (accessed May 15, 2012)
 The American Registry for Diagnostic Medical Sonography, "Broadcast of “Miracle Ectopic Pregnancy” Brought Quick Response by ARDMS," Registry Reports, XVI(5):1
 More than 400 reports of live birth from ectopic pregnancy. A partial listing of those reports can be found at http://www.personhoodinitiative.com/successful-ectopic-pregnancies.html
 Theodore J. Dubinsky MD, Francisco Guerra MD, Gustavo Gormaz MD, Nabil Maklad MD, PhD, "Fetal survival in abdominal pregnancy: A review of 11 cases," Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 24(9): 513–517, December 1996
 D Nkusu Nunyalulendho, EM Einterz, "Advanced abdominal pregnancy: case report and review of 163 cases reported since 1946," Rural and Remote Health, December 91, 2008
 Ayinur Nahar Hamid, Rokeya Begum, Zackya Sultana, Nargis Akhter, "Advanced Abdominal Pregnancy: A Case Report," Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers' Association, 21(1): 74-76, 2010
The source for the above material is Personhood Initiative and is available at this link here: http://www.personhoodinitiative.com/ectopic-personhood.html